Friday, 23 September 2016

Why Is Europe Deliberately Being Destroyed? My Take.

No other question has been bandied about as much during the last year as this: WHY? Why are European leaders (Mainly: Germany's Merkel) letting in a deluge of young unskilled Muslim males - unchecked, unregistered, uncontrolled?

The humanitarian argument didn't cut the mustard anymore when it became clear that most weren't actually from Syria (incidentally: Is shipping people out of the country the best way of dealing with a civil war?) but from Pakistan, India, North Africa and Central Africa - none a warzone. Then there was a spurious attempt to say those people were highly qualified workers and would boost the economy. (Laughable, no counter-argument necessary). Then we had the demographic ruse which is equally absurd: No more Germans? Hey let's take in 3 million Africans, I mean what's the difference! A "bums on seats" argument of the most primtive kind.

Okay, so the official explanations are clearly unsatisfactory. What does the other side have to say?

Having asked that question incessantly for a year, I'm probably familiar with every theory anybody ever had about this - from the banal ("Politicians are just incapable") to wacky ("It's a Zionist plot").
During this year I learned a lot about the New World Order, about the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission and various other arcane subjects.

I also came across some familiar figures from the past, e.g. R. Coudenhove-Kalergi who is high on the list of being responsible for the catastrophe we're now experiencing. Personally, I always found him a fascinating historical figure, well worth a proper biography. I also find his quest for a pan-European movement quite sympathetic. (Also proposed by Hubertus Prinz zu Löwenstein - surely not a suspicious figure). Bearing in mind that Coudenhove-Kalergi was writing in the 1920s where such ideas were common currency, I find it hard to imagine that this highly-cultured man of letters would have advocated an invasion of illiterate brutalised Third Word Muslims into Europe. In fact, I am one hunded percent certain, he would not. He is absolutely the wrong guy to blame for the various idiocies of the Merkel-"plan".

So... this leaves us where?  I think when something is intensely puzzling  and you just stand there open-mouthed wanting to shout "You What???" 20 times, you have to pause, let it all sink in and look for the most likely explanation. Which is why I would exclude the NWO theory. Creating all this mess, in order to provoke a civil war to then beat that down and start again is just too SciFi for me.

The answer (and of course this is only my theory) is much more simple.

A politician with immense power, and a massive chip on their shoulder. Somebody whose first term in office was blighted by set-backs, frustration and constant humiliation. Somebody with a dodgy past they have to conceal all the time. Somebody with a name that isn't real. Somebody with a massive amount of anger. Somebody who is black, has strong Muslim sympathies, and exhibits many gay tendencies. (Nothing wrong with any of those, unless you yourself think they mark you out as a lesser being.)

So - you guessed it, yes, the 44th President of the United States - Barack Obama II. A person whose hatred of all that he is not, is so overwhelming, he needs to destroy what he cannot be or have. Barack decided that after his disastrous first term (and the momentously catastrophic decision of the American people to grant him a second) he would not repeat his mistakes. He started to engage in the Politics of Revenge.

By persuading gullible, slightly off the pace politicians like Angela Merkel who basked in the warm sunshine of his praise, to take in millions of young uneducated Muslims into their own countries, Barry achieved 2 things at once - improving the conditions for the Brothers after all, getting millions of no-hopers out into highly developed European countries where they will be alimented from arrival til death is no mean feat and probably guarantees him a place in the Muslim pantheon. Hail Barry.

Secondly, and more importantly, Barry made sure that he got his own back. Affluence? Destroyed. Peace? Destroyed by civil unrest. Safety? Destroyed by sky-rocketing criminality. Freedom of speech? Eradicated. Whites? Put in their place by fear  and institutionalised black racism. The civil society? Replaced by sectarian hatred.

The humiliation of Mr. Obama, President, engendered the biggest hate crime ever: The unleashing of the Muslim invasion of the West.

Barry, together with your obliging, slightly backward handmaiden Merkel you've achieved so much more than any New World Order fantasy ever could!


  1. Right you are. However, it's just about 60% of the "Why". 40% come from Merkel's deep belief (also a kind of revenge for what her father, a pastor, did to her) that any religious person is worth two or more atheists. She would never ever have started this wave if the migrants were Russian or Czech unbelievers. There is plenty of proof for her attitude.

    Merkel is the ideal tool for Obama's plan indeed.

  2. I think your theory overestimates the Black Messiah. :-)

    Surely, he helped push European politics towards acceptance of Muslim mass immigration, but I don't think he was able to develop such a plan by himself. He might not be a Muslim, but he is biographically inclined and benevolent to their agenda. As Diana West pointed out, there are Muslim Brotherhood agents in the White House network. Not only Muslim immigration into Europe, but also the desastrous support of Islamists in the "Arab spring" (although only partially successful in the sense of MB goals) and Benghazi-gate point to direct influence of Muslim lobby groups like the MB on the president.

    Also, the interest of the political elites in mass immigration dates wider back in the past than Obama's presidency. Just remember Enoch Powell's famous "rivers of blood" speech from April 20, 1968 ( ). Back in that time, a sensitive conservative like Powell could already foresee the imminent destruction of nation state, of peoples, by the politics of mass immigration.

    Finally, I think you are too quick in swiping away alternative theories. Substitute "NWO" with "globalist" and any obscure NWO conspiracy theory you have heard or read with the pretty likely hypothesis that the globalist elites form networks behind the scenes to co-ordinate their actions towards their common goal - which is not to produce civil war in itself but to accept the foreseeable civil unrest and conflicts as an unavoidable side-effect of their goal to eliminate national sovereignty in favour of global power (since decades, they tell us slogans like "don't you agree that in these times we need global solutions to our global problems - so throw away your nation states and accept us as your new world leaders [hehe, they will eat this - or else...]")